canopy: be at sport good store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.56
, shade
Weight: 0.52
, item
Weight: 0.51
, product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dome
Weight: 0.33
, arch
Weight: 0.33
, tent
Weight: 0.33
, tree branch
Weight: 0.33
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at sport good store 1.00
be at store 0.80
be buy in store 0.77
be store when wet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canopy, be at sport good store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canopy, be at sport good store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canopy, be at sport good store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(product, be buy in store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canopy, be at sport good store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(product, be buy in store)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(product, be at store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(product, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(product, be at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(product, be at store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(product, be buy in store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tent, be at sport good store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tent, be store when wet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(product, be buy in store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tent, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tent, be at sport good store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tent, be store when wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tent, be store when wet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(canopy, be at sport good store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canopy, be at sport good store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(product, be buy in store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tent, be at sport good store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tent, be store when wet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(canopy, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(product, be buy in store)