cao: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.52
, compound
Weight: 0.50
, material
Weight: 0.36
, source
Weight: 0.35
Siblings lsd
Weight: 0.32
, amino acid
Weight: 0.31
, ascorbic acid
Weight: 0.31
, sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.31
, lactic acid
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cao, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cao, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lactic acid, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ascorbic acid, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lactic acid, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lsd, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cao, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cao, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lsd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lsd, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lactic acid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lactic acid, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ascorbic acid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ascorbic acid, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lactic acid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(lactic acid, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cao, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cao, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cao, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cao, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cao, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lsd, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lactic acid, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ascorbic acid, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lactic acid, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cao, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)