cap: be at sport good store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.62
, legislation
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.32
, helmet
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.31
, plan
Weight: 0.31
, collar
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at sport good store 1.00
be important in sport 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(time, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cap, be at sport good store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(time, be important in sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(time, be important in sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(helmet, be at sport good store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(time, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(cap, be at sport good store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(helmet, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(helmet, be at sport good store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cap, be at sport good store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cap, be at sport good store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cap, be at sport good store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(time, be important in sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(helmet, be at sport good store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(cap, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(time, be important in sport)