cap: be at suitcase

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.62
, legislation
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.32
, helmet
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.31
, plan
Weight: 0.31
, collar
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at suitcase 1.00
be at wallet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cap, be at suitcase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(bill, be at wallet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cap, be at suitcase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(bill, be at wallet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bill, be at wallet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cap, be at suitcase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cap, be at suitcase)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cap, be at suitcase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cap, be at suitcase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cap, be at suitcase)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cap, be at suitcase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cap, be at suitcase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cap, be at suitcase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bill, be at wallet)