cap: is big

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.62
, legislation
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.32
, helmet
Weight: 0.32
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cap, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(helmet, is big)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cap, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(helmet, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(helmet, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cap, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cap, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cap, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cap, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cap, is big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cap, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cap, is big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cap, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(helmet, is big)