capacitor: raise voltage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resistor
Weight: 0.71
, voltage
Weight: 0.65
, electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, transistor
Weight: 0.62
, inductor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings electrode
Weight: 0.63
, diode
Weight: 0.37
, volt
Weight: 0.36
, inverter
Weight: 0.36
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
raise voltage 1.00
have voltage 0.92
increase voltage 0.92
affect voltage 0.91
have same voltage 0.90
drop voltage 0.90
cause voltage drop 0.90
have voltage drop 0.90
have maximum voltage 0.87
remain in voltage source 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(resistor, cause voltage drop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(capacitor, raise voltage)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(resistor, drop voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(capacitor, raise voltage)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(resistor, drop voltage)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(resistor, cause voltage drop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(resistor, drop voltage)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(resistor, cause voltage drop)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(diode, have voltage drop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(resistor, cause voltage drop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(capacitor, raise voltage)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(resistor, drop voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(capacitor, raise voltage)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(diode, have voltage drop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(diode, have voltage drop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(capacitor, raise voltage)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(capacitor, affect voltage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, have same voltage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(capacitor, increase voltage)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(capacitor, increase voltage)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(capacitor, affect voltage)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(capacitor, raise voltage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(resistor, drop voltage)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(resistor, cause voltage drop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(diode, have voltage drop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(resistor, drop voltage)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(capacitor, raise voltage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(resistor, cause voltage drop)