capacitor: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resistor
Weight: 0.71
, voltage
Weight: 0.65
, electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, transistor
Weight: 0.62
, inductor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings electrode
Weight: 0.63
, diode
Weight: 0.37
, volt
Weight: 0.36
, inverter
Weight: 0.36
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was invented 0.81
develop 0.77
were for automobiles developed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, were for automobiles developed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(microprocessor, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, was invented)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(microprocessor, were for automobiles developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, were for automobiles developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(capacitor, was developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(capacitor, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(microprocessor, were for automobiles developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(microprocessor, was invented)