capacity: be lower than males

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.68
, value
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings liter
Weight: 0.55
, power plant
Weight: 0.35
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.34
, power line
Weight: 0.33
, throughput
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be lower than males 1.00
be placed on male children 0.77
decrease with age 0.75
attractive in men 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(quality, attractive in men)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(capacity, be lower than males)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(value, be placed on male children)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(capacity, be lower than males)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(value, be placed on male children)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(quality, attractive in men)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(value, be placed on male children)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(quality, attractive in men)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(quality, attractive in men)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(capacity, be lower than males)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(value, be placed on male children)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(capacity, be lower than males)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(capacity, be lower than males)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(capacity, decrease with age)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(capacity, decrease with age)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(capacity, decrease with age)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(capacity, decrease with age)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be lower than males)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(capacity, be lower than males)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(value, be placed on male children)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(quality, attractive in men)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(value, be placed on male children)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(capacity, be lower than males)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(quality, attractive in men)