capacity: be on storage related to price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.68
, value
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings liter
Weight: 0.55
, power plant
Weight: 0.35
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.34
, power line
Weight: 0.33
, throughput
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on storage related to price 1.00
be on storage related 0.93
be on storage 0.91
affect price 0.83
be x price 0.79
be based pricing 0.78
be based pricing better 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(value, be based pricing better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(capacity, be on storage related to price)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(quality, be x price)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(capacity, be on storage related to price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(quality, be x price)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(value, be based pricing better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(quality, be x price)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(value, be based pricing better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(value, be based pricing better)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(capacity, be on storage related to price)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(quality, be x price)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(capacity, be on storage related to price)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(capacity, be on storage related to price)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(capacity, be on storage)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(capacity, be on storage related)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(capacity, be on storage)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(capacity, be on storage)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(capacity, be on storage related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(capacity, be on storage related)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be on storage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related to price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(capacity, be on storage related to price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(quality, be x price)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(value, be based pricing better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(quality, be x price)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(capacity, be on storage related to price)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(value, be based pricing better)