capacity: is importance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.68
, value
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings liter
Weight: 0.55
, power plant
Weight: 0.35
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.34
, power line
Weight: 0.33
, throughput
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is importance 1.00
is location importance 0.91
contribute to effectiveness essence 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(facility, is location importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(capacity, is importance)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(capacity, is importance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(facility, is location importance)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(facility, is location importance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(facility, is location importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(capacity, is importance)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(capacity, is importance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(capacity, is importance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(capacity, is importance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(capacity, is importance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(facility, is location importance)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(facility, is location importance)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(capacity, is importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence)