caper: taste like fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, dish
Weight: 0.45
, food
Weight: 0.43
Siblings thief
Weight: 0.32
, horror movie
Weight: 0.32
, movie theatre
Weight: 0.32
, drama
Weight: 0.32
, pun
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste like fish 1.00
taste bad 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(caper, taste like fish)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(caper, taste like fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(caper, taste like fish)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(caper, taste bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(caper, taste bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(caper, taste bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(caper, taste bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(caper, taste like fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(caper, taste like fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(caper, taste like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)