capital: be at europe

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.60
, stock
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.58
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings baghdad
Weight: 0.59
, stockholm
Weight: 0.58
, canberra
Weight: 0.46
, investment
Weight: 0.33
, debt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at europe 1.00
be at germany 0.84
be a part of sweden 0.81
be a part of australia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(city, be at germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(capital, be at europe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(city, be at germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(city, be at germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be a part of sweden)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(canberra, be a part of australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(city, be at germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(capital, be at europe)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(stockholm, be a part of sweden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(stockholm, be a part of sweden)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(canberra, be a part of australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(canberra, be a part of australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(capital, be at europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(capital, be at europe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(capital, be at europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(city, be at germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(stockholm, be a part of sweden)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(canberra, be a part of australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(capital, be at europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(city, be at germany)