capitalism: be good for poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ideology
Weight: 0.77
, word
Weight: 0.62
, concept
Weight: 0.61
, socialist
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.58
Siblings socialism
Weight: 0.40
, liberalism
Weight: 0.40
, communism
Weight: 0.39
, anarchism
Weight: 0.38
, political ideology
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for poor 1.00
be bad for poor 0.98
has quality bad 0.83
has quality good 0.82
be good for society 0.78
has quality better 0.78
is great 0.76
is good thing 0.76
is bad thing 0.76
be good for america 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(capitalism, be good for poor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(communism, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(communism, is great)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(socialism, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(anarchism, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liberalism, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(socialism, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(liberalism, is bad thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(communism, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(socialism, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(socialism, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(liberalism, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(socialism, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(liberalism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(liberalism, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(socialism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(socialism, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(communism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(communism, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(socialism, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(socialism, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(liberalism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(liberalism, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(communism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(communism, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(socialism, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(socialism, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(socialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(socialism, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(communism, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(communism, is great)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(anarchism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(anarchism, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(liberalism, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(liberalism, is bad thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(socialism, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(socialism, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(capitalism, be good for poor)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be bad for poor)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(capitalism, be bad for poor)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be bad for poor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(capitalism, be bad for poor)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(capitalism, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(capitalism, be good for america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(capitalism, be good for america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, is great)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be good for america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(capitalism, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(capitalism, is good thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(capitalism, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(capitalism, is good thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(capitalism, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(capitalism, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(capitalism, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(capitalism, be good for poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(socialism, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(liberalism, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(communism, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(liberalism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(liberalism, is bad thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(communism, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(socialism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(socialism, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(anarchism, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(socialism, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(socialism, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(communism, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(capitalism, be good for poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)