caramel: be just melted sugar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.73
, sweet
Weight: 0.68
, color
Weight: 0.68
, sauce
Weight: 0.60
Siblings vanilla
Weight: 0.70
, cinnamon
Weight: 0.39
, raspberry
Weight: 0.38
, toffee
Weight: 0.38
, cheesecake
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be just melted sugar 1.00
is just sugar 0.87
is just burnt sugar 0.86
is burnt sugar 0.84
is sugar 0.83
melt 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, melt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cheesecake, melt)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cheesecake, melt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(caramel, be just melted sugar)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(caramel, is burnt sugar)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(caramel, is burnt sugar)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(caramel, is burnt sugar)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(caramel, melt)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(caramel, melt)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(caramel, is sugar)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(caramel, melt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(caramel, is sugar)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(caramel, is just burnt sugar)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(caramel, is sugar)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(caramel, melt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(caramel, is just burnt sugar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(caramel, is just burnt sugar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(caramel, is burnt sugar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(caramel, is sugar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(caramel, is just sugar)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(caramel, is just sugar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(caramel, is just burnt sugar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(caramel, is just sugar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(caramel, is just sugar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(caramel, be just melted sugar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(caramel, be just melted sugar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(caramel, be just melted sugar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cheesecake, melt)