card: be at back

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents smart card
Weight: 0.90
, business card
Weight: 0.79
, credit card
Weight: 0.78
, debit card
Weight: 0.71
Siblings sound card
Weight: 0.79
, wild card
Weight: 0.77
, trading card
Weight: 0.75
, green card
Weight: 0.70
, visa card
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at back 1.00
go back to new 0.88
be at back of packs 0.82
be in reshef 0.79
be in scotties 0.79
be in yu-gi-oh reshef 0.79
have have strip on back 0.78
have strip on back 0.78
stay in in next round 0.76
have stripe at back 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(credit card, have have strip on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(card, be at back)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(credit card, have strip on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(card, be at back)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(credit card, have stripe at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(card, be at back)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(credit card, have have strip on back)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(credit card, have strip on back)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(credit card, have stripe at back)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(credit card, have strip on back)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(credit card, have have strip on back)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(credit card, have stripe at back)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(wild card, be in scotties)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(credit card, have have strip on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(card, be at back)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(credit card, have strip on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(card, be at back)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(credit card, have stripe at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(card, be at back)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(wild card, be in scotties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(wild card, be in scotties)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(card, be at back)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(card, be at back)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(card, be at back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(credit card, have have strip on back)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(credit card, have strip on back)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(credit card, have stripe at back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wild card, be in scotties)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(credit card, have have strip on back)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(credit card, have strip on back)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(card, be at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(credit card, have stripe at back)