card: be at casino

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents credit card
Weight: 0.78
, debit card
Weight: 0.71
, business card
Weight: 0.66
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wild card
Weight: 0.77
, visa card
Weight: 0.68
, index card
Weight: 0.65
, payment
Weight: 0.63
, id
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at casino 1.00
be used to play blackjack 0.79
be used to play poker 0.79
be at poker deck 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(card, be at casino)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(card, be used to play blackjack)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(card, be used to play poker)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(card, be used to play poker)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(card, be at poker deck)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(card, be used to play blackjack)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(card, be at poker deck)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(card, be at poker deck)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(card, be at poker deck)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(card, be used to play blackjack)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(card, be used to play blackjack)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(card, be used to play poker)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(card, be used to play poker)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(card, be at casino)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(card, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(card, be at casino)