card: be dumb

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents credit card
Weight: 0.78
, debit card
Weight: 0.71
, business card
Weight: 0.66
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wild card
Weight: 0.77
, visa card
Weight: 0.68
, index card
Weight: 0.65
, payment
Weight: 0.63
, id
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dumb 1.00
wants to fuck her silly 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(card, be dumb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(id, wants to fuck her silly)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, be dumb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(id, wants to fuck her silly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(id, wants to fuck her silly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, be dumb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(card, be dumb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(card, be dumb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(card, be dumb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(card, be dumb)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(card, be dumb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(card, be dumb)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(card, be dumb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(id, wants to fuck her silly)