cardboard: be more sustainable than plastic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cardboard box
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings styrofoam
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.34
, paper towel
Weight: 0.34
, burlap
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more sustainable than plastic 1.00
be better than plastic 0.89
is biodegradable 0.76
is environmentally friendly 0.76
is recyclable 0.75
be recycled 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(material, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cardboard box, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(item, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(item, be recycled)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cardboard box, be recycled)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(material, be recycled)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(material, be recycled)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(item, be recycled)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cardboard box, be recycled)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be recycled)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is biodegradable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(material, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cardboard box, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(item, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(styrofoam, is biodegradable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is biodegradable)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be recycled)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cardboard, be better than plastic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be better than plastic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cardboard, be better than plastic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cardboard, is biodegradable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cardboard, be recycled)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cardboard, is recyclable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cardboard, is environmentally friendly)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(cardboard, is biodegradable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cardboard, is biodegradable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be recycled)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cardboard, is environmentally friendly)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cardboard, is environmentally friendly)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(cardboard, be recycled)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cardboard, is recyclable)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(cardboard, is recyclable)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is environmentally friendly)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is biodegradable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be better than plastic)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be recycled)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is recyclable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(item, be recycled)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cardboard box, be recycled)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(material, be recycled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is biodegradable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be recycled)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(item, be recycled)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cardboard box, be recycled)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cardboard, be more sustainable than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(material, be recycled)