cardiac muscle: have better capillary network than skeletal muscles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.68
, organ
Weight: 0.62
, muscle
Weight: 0.61
, cell
Weight: 0.53
, factor
Weight: 0.53
Siblings muscle cell
Weight: 0.38
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.38
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.37
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.36
, bone cell
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have better capillary network than skeletal muscles 1.00
be different than skeletal muscle 0.87
be different from skeletal muscle 0.86
be similar to skeletal muscle 0.86
be different to muscles 0.85
be similar to muscles 0.85
be different to other muscles 0.84
resemble skeletal muscle 0.84
be called muscles 0.83
be similar to smooth muscles 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(muscle, be called muscles)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(muscle, be called muscles)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(muscle, be called muscles)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(muscle, be called muscles)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, be different than skeletal muscle)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, be similar to skeletal muscle)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, be different from skeletal muscle)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, resemble skeletal muscle)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, be similar to muscles)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, be called muscles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, be different to muscles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, be different from skeletal muscle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, be called muscles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, be similar to skeletal muscle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, be different than skeletal muscle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, resemble skeletal muscle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, be similar to muscles)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, be different to muscles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, be different from skeletal muscle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, be similar to smooth muscles)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, be different than skeletal muscle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, be called muscles)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, be similar to smooth muscles)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, be similar to muscles)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, be similar to skeletal muscle)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, be similar to smooth muscles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, be similar to smooth muscles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, be different to muscles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, be different to other muscles)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, resemble skeletal muscle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, be different to other muscles)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(cardiac muscle, be different to other muscles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(cardiac muscle, be different to other muscles)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, be different to muscles)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, be different from skeletal muscle)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, be different than skeletal muscle)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, be similar to muscles)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, be similar to skeletal muscle)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, be called muscles)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, resemble skeletal muscle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(muscle, be called muscles)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cardiac muscle, have better capillary network than skeletal muscles)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(muscle, be called muscles)