cardinal: adapt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.61
, bishop
Weight: 0.58
, species
Weight: 0.55
, pope
Weight: 0.54
Siblings priest
Weight: 0.35
, catholic priest
Weight: 0.35
, golden eagle
Weight: 0.33
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt 1.00
adapt to change of season 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(species, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cardinal, adapt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(species, adapt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(species, adapt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(species, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cardinal, adapt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cardinal, adapt)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, adapt to change of season)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cardinal, adapt to change of season)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cardinal, adapt to change of season)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cardinal, adapt to change of season)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, adapt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cardinal, adapt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(species, adapt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cardinal, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(species, adapt)