:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carmel, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lima, is cold)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carmel, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(montana, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carmel, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, is cold)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carmel, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(lima, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lima, is cold)
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carmel, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(carmel, is cold)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carmel, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(carmel, is cold)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carmel, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lima, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carmel, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tasmania, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carmel, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(montana, is cold)