carnivore: adapt in deserts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt in deserts 1.00
adapt in desert 0.93
be seen in deserts 0.89
get water in desert 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(carnivore, adapt in deserts)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, adapt in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(carnivore, adapt in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(carnivore, adapt in desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, get water in desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(carnivore, adapt in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be seen in deserts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(carnivore, get water in desert)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(carnivore, be seen in deserts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(carnivore, be seen in deserts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(carnivore, be seen in deserts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(carnivore, get water in desert)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(carnivore, get water in desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, adapt in deserts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(carnivore, adapt in deserts)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(carnivore, adapt in deserts)