carnivore: be at zoo

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
, program
Weight: 0.52
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64
, bobcat
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at zoo 1.00
mother cub 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wild animal, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carnivore, be at zoo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at zoo)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bear, mother cub)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wild animal, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(carnivore, be at zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bear, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bear, be at zoo)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(bear, mother cub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bear, mother cub)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(carnivore, be at zoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carnivore, be at zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bear, be at zoo)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bear, mother cub)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(carnivore, be at zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at zoo)