carpenter: complete house

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, artist
Weight: 0.69
, craftsman
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings mason
Weight: 0.38
, painter
Weight: 0.37
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.37
, electrician
Weight: 0.37
, roofer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
complete house 1.00
be at house 0.81
complete bookshelf 0.77
clean house 0.77
build house 0.77
complete bookcase 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bricklayer, build house)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(bricklayer, build house)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bricklayer, build house)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(carpenter, complete house)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(carpenter, complete bookcase)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(carpenter, complete bookshelf)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, complete bookcase)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(carpenter, complete bookcase)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, complete bookshelf)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carpenter, complete bookshelf)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(carpenter, complete bookcase)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(carpenter, complete bookshelf)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, complete house)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(carpenter, complete house)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, complete house)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bricklayer, build house)