carpenter: nail board onto deck

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, artist
Weight: 0.69
, craftsman
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings mason
Weight: 0.38
, painter
Weight: 0.37
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.37
, electrician
Weight: 0.37
, roofer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
nail board onto deck 1.00
nail together board 0.85
build deck 0.84
be finish wooden deck 0.83
nail idea down 0.79
wall off room 0.78
nail two piece of wood together 0.78
see board 0.77
nail roof material to roof 0.77
up board 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(construction worker, nail roof material to roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(carpenter, nail board onto deck)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(construction worker, nail roof material to roof)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, nail roof material to roof)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(painter, be finish wooden deck)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bricklayer, wall off room)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mason, wall off room)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(construction worker, nail roof material to roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bricklayer, wall off room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bricklayer, wall off room)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mason, wall off room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(mason, wall off room)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(painter, be finish wooden deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(painter, be finish wooden deck)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(carpenter, nail board onto deck)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(carpenter, build deck)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(carpenter, nail together board)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(carpenter, up board)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(carpenter, nail two piece of wood together)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, build deck)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(carpenter, build deck)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(carpenter, nail together board)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(carpenter, build deck)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(carpenter, nail two piece of wood together)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(carpenter, nail together board)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail together board)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, up board)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail two piece of wood together)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(carpenter, nail two piece of wood together)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(carpenter, up board)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(carpenter, up board)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(carpenter, nail board onto deck)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(construction worker, nail roof material to roof)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mason, wall off room)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bricklayer, wall off room)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painter, be finish wooden deck)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(carpenter, nail board onto deck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(construction worker, nail roof material to roof)