carrier: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	third party Weight: 0.63 , manufacturer Weight: 0.62 , brand Weight: 0.59 , vehicle Weight: 0.57
Siblings	airline Weight: 0.66 , airplane Weight: 0.62 , fedex Weight: 0.59 , cricket Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
have good	0.88
has quality shit	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(carrier, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(cricket, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(carrier, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(cricket, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(cricket, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(carrier, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(carrier, have good)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(carrier, have good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(carrier, have good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(carrier, have good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(carrier, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(carrier, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(cricket, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(carrier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)