case: be expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.64
, type
Weight: 0.63
, instance
Weight: 0.62
, piece
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cold case
Weight: 0.68
, habeas corpus
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.61
, nelson
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in canada 1.00
be decided in canada 0.88
be in chinese 0.75
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(court case, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(case, be expensive in canada)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(court case, be decided in canada)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(case, be expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(court case, be decided in canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(court case, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(court case, be decided in canada)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(court case, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(court case, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(case, be expensive in canada)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(court case, be decided in canada)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(case, be expensive in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(case, be expensive in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(case, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(case, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(court case, be decided in canada)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(court case, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(court case, be decided in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(case, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(court case, is expensive)