case: be titled in terms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.64
, type
Weight: 0.63
, instance
Weight: 0.62
, piece
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cold case
Weight: 0.68
, habeas corpus
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.61
, nelson
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be titled in terms 1.00
be titled in terms of state 0.98
be titled in terms of state against defendant 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(case, be titled in terms)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(case, be titled in terms of state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(case, be titled in terms of state against defendant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(case, be titled in terms of state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(case, be titled in terms of state against defendant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(case, be titled in terms of state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(case, be titled in terms of state against defendant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(case, be titled in terms of state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(case, be titled in terms of state against defendant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(case, be titled in terms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(case, be titled in terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(case, be titled in terms)