cashew: cost more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.55
, nut
Weight: 0.48
, plantation
Weight: 0.47
Siblings cassava
Weight: 0.37
, banana
Weight: 0.36
, paddy
Weight: 0.36
, pineapple
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost more 1.00
cost more than peanuts 0.86
is more expensive 0.85
be more expensive than peanuts 0.78
be expensive in 2017 0.77
is expensive 0.76
is expensive now 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cashew, cost more)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cashew, cost more)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cashew, cost more)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(nut, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cashew, cost more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(product, cost more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(nut, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(product, cost more)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nut, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pineapple, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cashew, cost more)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cashew, cost more)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cashew, cost more)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(nut, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cashew, cost more)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pineapple, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pineapple, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cashew, cost more)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cashew, cost more than peanuts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cashew, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cashew, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cashew, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cashew, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(cashew, cost more than peanuts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cashew, cost more than peanuts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more than peanuts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cashew, be expensive in 2017)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cashew, is more expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cashew, is expensive now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cashew, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cashew, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cashew, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be expensive in 2017)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cashew, be expensive in 2017)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cashew, be expensive in 2017)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cashew, is expensive now)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cashew, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, is expensive now)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cashew, is expensive now)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cashew, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cashew, cost more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nut, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pineapple, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nut, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cashew, cost more)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)