casual: be full of net decks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.50
, word
Weight: 0.48
, look
Weight: 0.46
, woman
Weight: 0.44
Siblings cute
Weight: 0.30
, nice
Weight: 0.30
, fun
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be full of net decks 1.00
be full of decks 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(casual, be full of net decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(casual, be full of net decks)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(casual, be full of net decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(casual, be full of decks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(casual, be full of net decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(casual, be full of decks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(casual, be full of net decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(casual, be full of decks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(casual, be full of net decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(casual, be full of decks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(casual, be full of net decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(casual, be full of net decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(casual, be full of net decks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(casual, be full of net decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(casual, be full of net decks)