casual: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.50
, word
Weight: 0.48
, look
Weight: 0.46
, woman
Weight: 0.44
Siblings cute
Weight: 0.30
, nice
Weight: 0.30
, fun
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
is harder 0.84
is fucking hard 0.83
just is as hard as legend rank 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(casual, is hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(casual, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(casual, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(casual, is harder)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(casual, is fucking hard)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(casual, is harder)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(casual, is fucking hard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(casual, is harder)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(casual, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(casual, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(casual, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)