:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(dog, be at rug)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cat, be at rug)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cat, be at rug)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(dog, be at rug)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cat, be at rug)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dog, be at rug)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cat, be at rug)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cat, be at rug)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cat, be at rug)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cat, be at rug)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cat, be at rug)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dog, be at rug)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(cat, be at rug)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dog, be at rug)