cat: fight dog

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, feline
Weight: 0.71
, dog
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.68
Siblings tabby cat
Weight: 0.80
, black cat
Weight: 0.79
, tiger
Weight: 0.73
, kitten
Weight: 0.67
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
fight dog 1.00
be afraid of dog 0.82
be at dog mouth 0.79
be follow by dog 0.79
be eat cat food 0.79
eat cat food 0.78
be at cat show 0.78
be at my dog mouth 0.78
wants to be pet 0.77
be at cat town 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(kitten, eat cat food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(kitten, eat cat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(kitten, eat cat food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cat, fight dog)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cat, be eat cat food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cat, eat cat food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cat, be eat cat food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cat, eat cat food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, eat cat food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, be eat cat food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cat, be eat cat food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cat, eat cat food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cat, fight dog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cat, fight dog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cat, fight dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(kitten, eat cat food)