catabolism: is is would best described

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metabolism
Weight: 0.43
, tissue
Weight: 0.35
, process
Weight: 0.29
Siblings endocrine system
Weight: 0.29
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.29
, glycolysis
Weight: 0.29
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.29
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is would best described 1.00
is is would described 0.97
be described having 0.85
is thought 0.78
be called mansize 0.78
be called pseudostratified 0.78
is amphibolic 0.77
is exergonic 0.77
is prezi 0.77
is mansize 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tissue, be called mansize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catabolism, is is would best described)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tissue, be called pseudostratified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catabolism, is is would best described)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tissue, be called pseudostratified)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tissue, be called mansize)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be called pseudostratified)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be called mansize)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(glycolysis, be described having)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bone tissue, is prezi)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(glycolysis, is thought)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(glycolysis, is exergonic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tissue, be called mansize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tissue, be called pseudostratified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(glycolysis, be described having) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(glycolysis, be described having)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(glycolysis, is exergonic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(glycolysis, is exergonic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(glycolysis, is thought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(glycolysis, is thought)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bone tissue, is prezi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bone tissue, is prezi)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(catabolism, is is would best described)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(catabolism, is is would described)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(catabolism, is is would described)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(catabolism, is is would described)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would described)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(catabolism, is exergonic)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(catabolism, is exergonic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(catabolism, is exergonic)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is exergonic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catabolism, is is would best described)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tissue, be called pseudostratified)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tissue, be called mansize)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(glycolysis, be described having)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(glycolysis, is exergonic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(glycolysis, is thought)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bone tissue, is prezi)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tissue, be called pseudostratified)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(catabolism, is is would best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tissue, be called mansize)