catapult: be considered complex machines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents machine
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, device
Weight: 0.47
, weapon
Weight: 0.46
, mechanism
Weight: 0.46
Siblings slingshot
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.31
, jump
Weight: 0.31
, grinder
Weight: 0.31
, screw
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered complex machines 1.00
be considered machines 0.93
is machine 0.81
is simple machine 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(screw, is machine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(screw, is machine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(screw, is machine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(catapult, be considered complex machines)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(catapult, be considered machines)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(catapult, be considered machines)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(catapult, is machine)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(catapult, be considered machines)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(catapult, is machine)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(catapult, is simple machine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(catapult, be considered machines)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(catapult, is machine)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(catapult, is simple machine)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(catapult, is simple machine)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(catapult, is simple machine)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(catapult, is machine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(catapult, be considered complex machines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(catapult, be considered complex machines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(catapult, be considered complex machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(screw, is machine)