cataract: form in diabetic dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.66
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.66
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, disease
Weight: 0.59
Siblings glaucoma
Weight: 0.36
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.35
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
form in diabetic dogs 1.00
form in dogs 0.83
occur in diabetes 0.79
be more prevalent in diabetics 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(complication, occur in diabetes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cataract, form in diabetic dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(complication, occur in diabetes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(complication, occur in diabetes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be more prevalent in diabetics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(complication, occur in diabetes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cataract, form in diabetic dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(glaucoma, be more prevalent in diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be more prevalent in diabetics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cataract, form in diabetic dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cataract, form in dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cataract, form in dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cataract, form in dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cataract, form in dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cataract, occur in diabetes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cataract, occur in diabetes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cataract, occur in diabetes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cataract, occur in diabetes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cataract, form in diabetic dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cataract, form in diabetic dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(complication, occur in diabetes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be more prevalent in diabetics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cataract, form in diabetic dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(complication, occur in diabetes)