cataract: is done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.66
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.66
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, disease
Weight: 0.59
Siblings glaucoma
Weight: 0.36
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.35
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is done 1.00
be done on nose 0.83
is performed nowadays 0.78
is performed 0.76
is good thing 0.76
be performed 0.75
be performed today 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, be done on nose)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, be performed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is performed nowadays)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is done)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be performed today)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is performed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is done)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is done)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is performed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is done)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, is done)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is done)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is done)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is done)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is done)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(plastic surgery, be done on nose)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, be done on nose)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is performed)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, is performed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is performed)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is performed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be performed today)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be performed today)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is performed nowadays)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, is performed nowadays)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is good thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(plastic surgery, be performed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, be performed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cataract, is done)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cataract, is done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, is done)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is done)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is done)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, is performed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is performed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, be done on nose)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, be performed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be performed today)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, is performed nowadays)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cataract, is done)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is good thing)