caterpillar: be called insect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, customer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.66
, silkworm
Weight: 0.63
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, tree frog
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called insect 1.00
be called caterpillar 0.85
has state pest 0.84
has state pests 0.84
be pest to farmers 0.80
eat milkweed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(insect, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(caterpillar, be called insect)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(insect, has state pest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(insect, has state pest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gypsy moth, has state pest)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, be called insect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(insect, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(silkworm, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(silkworm, be called insect)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gypsy moth, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(gypsy moth, has state pest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(caterpillar, be called insect)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, has state pest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, has state pests)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, be called caterpillar)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, be pest to farmers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, eat milkweed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(caterpillar, be called caterpillar)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(caterpillar, eat milkweed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(caterpillar, be pest to farmers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(caterpillar, be called caterpillar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(caterpillar, has state pest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(caterpillar, be called caterpillar)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(caterpillar, has state pests)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(caterpillar, eat milkweed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(caterpillar, be pest to farmers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(caterpillar, has state pests)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(caterpillar, has state pest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(caterpillar, eat milkweed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(caterpillar, be pest to farmers)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(caterpillar, has state pest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(caterpillar, has state pests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(caterpillar, be called insect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(insect, has state pest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(silkworm, be called insect)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gypsy moth, has state pest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(caterpillar, be called insect)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(insect, has state pest)