caterpillar: climb walls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, customer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.66
, silkworm
Weight: 0.63
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, tree frog
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
climb walls 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, climb walls)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lizard, climb walls)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(caterpillar, climb walls)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(lizard, climb walls)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(lizard, climb walls)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(caterpillar, climb walls)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(caterpillar, climb walls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(caterpillar, climb walls)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(caterpillar, climb walls)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, climb walls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(caterpillar, climb walls)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(caterpillar, climb walls)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(caterpillar, climb walls)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lizard, climb walls)