catherine: was great important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents saint
Weight: 0.62
, child
Weight: 0.55
, friend
Weight: 0.54
, woman
Weight: 0.54
Siblings paul
Weight: 0.35
, thomas
Weight: 0.35
, queen elizabeth
Weight: 0.34
, elizabeth
Weight: 0.34
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was great important 1.00
is great important 0.98
was great 0.96
was great great 0.96
is great 0.95
is great great 0.94
was great considered 0.91
was great famous 0.91
is great famous 0.89
is great good queen 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mahatma gandhi, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mahatma gandhi, is great)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mahatma gandhi, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(catherine, was great important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catherine, is great important)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(catherine, was great)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(catherine, was great great)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(catherine, is great important)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(catherine, was great)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(catherine, was great great)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(catherine, was great considered)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(catherine, was great)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(catherine, is great important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(catherine, was great great)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(catherine, was great famous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(catherine, was great considered)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catherine, is great famous)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(catherine, was great famous)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(catherine, was great considered)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(catherine, is great famous)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(catherine, is great good queen)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(catherine, was great famous)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(catherine, is great good queen)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(catherine, is great famous)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(catherine, is great good queen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catherine, was great great)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(catherine, was great)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(catherine, is great important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(catherine, was great famous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(catherine, is great famous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(catherine, was great considered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(catherine, is great good queen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(catherine, was great important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(catherine, was great important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(catherine, was great important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mahatma gandhi, is great)