catheter: hurt bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.60
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, tube
Weight: 0.57
Siblings endotracheal tube
Weight: 0.75
, cannula
Weight: 0.57
, implant
Weight: 0.36
, stent
Weight: 0.35
, hypodermic needle
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt bad 1.00
hurt 0.95
has quality bad 0.77
is terrible 0.76
get damaged 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tube, get damaged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(catheter, hurt bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tube, get damaged)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tube, get damaged)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(implant, hurt)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cannula, hurt)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(stent, hurt)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implant, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tube, get damaged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(catheter, hurt bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(stent, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(stent, hurt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cannula, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cannula, hurt)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(implant, hurt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(implant, hurt)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(implant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(implant, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(catheter, hurt bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(catheter, hurt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(catheter, hurt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(catheter, hurt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(catheter, hurt bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tube, get damaged)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(stent, hurt)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(implant, hurt)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cannula, hurt)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(implant, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(catheter, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tube, get damaged)