catholic priest: abuse children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.67
, child molester
Weight: 0.66
, christian
Weight: 0.64
, church
Weight: 0.63
Siblings catholic
Weight: 0.37
, bishop
Weight: 0.37
, roman catholic
Weight: 0.37
, pope
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
abuse children 1.00
justify child abuse 0.90
be prone to child molestation 0.81
molest boys rather than girls 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(catholic priest, abuse children)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(catholic priest, justify child abuse)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(catholic priest, molest boys rather than girls)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(catholic priest, be prone to child molestation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, molest boys rather than girls)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(catholic priest, molest boys rather than girls)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, molest boys rather than girls)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, be prone to child molestation)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, justify child abuse)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, justify child abuse)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, be prone to child molestation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(catholic priest, be prone to child molestation)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(catholic priest, justify child abuse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, abuse children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(catholic priest, abuse children)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(catholic priest, abuse children)