catholic priest: wear rings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.67
, child molester
Weight: 0.66
, christian
Weight: 0.64
, church
Weight: 0.63
Siblings catholic
Weight: 0.37
, bishop
Weight: 0.37
, roman catholic
Weight: 0.37
, pope
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear rings 1.00
wear yamaka 0.84
wear hats 0.82
wear kippahs 0.81
wear black 0.79
wear white 0.79
wear dresses 0.79
wear collars 0.78
wear pink robes 0.77
wear robes during mass 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear rings)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pope, wear hats)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear hats)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear kippahs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pope, wear white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(bishop, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear rings)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pope, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pope, wear hats)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bishop, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear hats)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(bishop, wear kippahs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear kippahs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pope, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pope, wear white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(catholic priest, wear rings)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, wear yamaka)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(catholic priest, wear yamaka)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(catholic priest, wear yamaka)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear yamaka)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(catholic priest, wear kippahs)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(catholic priest, wear rings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pope, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bishop, wear rings)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bishop, wear hats)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bishop, wear kippahs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear rings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pope, wear white)