cattle drive: were needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.47
Siblings test drive
Weight: 0.31
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.30
, business activity
Weight: 0.30
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.30
, breeding
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
were needed 1.00
is needed 0.93
were needed in days 0.92
were necessary 0.90
were needed in early days 0.88
is necessary 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(business activity, is needed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(animal husbandry, is necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(business activity, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(business activity, is needed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(animal husbandry, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal husbandry, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cattle drive, were needed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cattle drive, were necessary)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cattle drive, were needed in days)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cattle drive, were needed in early days)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cattle drive, were necessary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cattle drive, were needed in days)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cattle drive, were needed in days)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed in days)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cattle drive, were necessary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cattle drive, were needed in early days)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cattle drive, were needed in early days)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed in early days)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cattle drive, were necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cattle drive, were needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(business activity, is needed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cattle drive, were needed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(animal husbandry, is necessary)