cattle: be beneficial to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ruminant
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, occupation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hog
Weight: 0.52
, heifer
Weight: 0.43
, yak
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to people 1.00
be important to maasai 0.79
be important to xhosa 0.79
were useful to farmers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cattle, be beneficial to people)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cattle, be important to xhosa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cattle, be important to maasai)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cattle, were useful to farmers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cattle, be important to xhosa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cattle, be important to xhosa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cattle, be important to xhosa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cattle, be important to maasai)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cattle, were useful to farmers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cattle, be important to maasai)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cattle, were useful to farmers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cattle, be important to maasai)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cattle, were useful to farmers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cattle, be beneficial to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(cattle, be beneficial to people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cattle, be beneficial to people)