cattle: be important to texas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ruminant
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, occupation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hog
Weight: 0.52
, heifer
Weight: 0.43
, yak
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to texas 1.00
was important in texas 0.98
be important to arizona 0.80
be important to new york 0.75
were important in early india 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cattle, be important to texas)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cattle, was important in texas)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cattle, was important in texas)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cattle, was important in texas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cattle, was important in texas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cattle, were important in early india)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cattle, were important in early india)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cattle, be important to new york)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cattle, be important to new york)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cattle, were important in early india)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cattle, be important to new york)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cattle, were important in early india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(cattle, be important to new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cattle, be important to texas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cattle, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cattle, be important to texas)