:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cellar, is cold)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(basement, is cold)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(cave, is cold)
Similarity expansion
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cave, has state wet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cave, has state wet)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cave, is cold)
Typical implies Plausible
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cave, is cold)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(basement, is cold)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cave, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cellar, is cold)