cavity: be at dentist

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.57
, disease
Weight: 0.54
, structure
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, treatment
Weight: 0.51
Siblings molar
Weight: 0.61
, vagina
Weight: 0.52
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.33
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.32
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at dentist 1.00
be used to dentist to fill 0.90
be treat by dentist 0.90
be used to dentist to drill and fill 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, be treat by dentist)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(tooth decay, be treat by dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tooth decay, be treat by dentist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(cavity, be at dentist)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cavity, be used to dentist to fill)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cavity, be used to dentist to drill and fill)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cavity, be used to dentist to fill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cavity, be used to dentist to fill)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cavity, be used to dentist to drill and fill)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cavity, be used to dentist to fill)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cavity, be used to dentist to drill and fill)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cavity, be used to dentist to drill and fill)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cavity, be at dentist)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cavity, be at dentist)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cavity, be at dentist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tooth decay, be treat by dentist)