cavity: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.57
, disease
Weight: 0.54
, structure
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, treatment
Weight: 0.51
Siblings molar
Weight: 0.61
, ventricle
Weight: 0.41
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
smell bad 0.84
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cavity, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cavity, taste bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(cavity, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cavity, smell bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cavity, smell bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cavity, smell bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cavity, smell bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cavity, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cavity, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cavity, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cavity, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cavity, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cavity, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cavity, taste bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)