:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(floppy disk, go bad)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cd, go bad)
Similarity expansion
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cd, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cd, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cd, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cd, has quality bad)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cd, go bad)
Typical implies Plausible
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cd, go bad)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cd, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(floppy disk, go bad)